Delicately adorable and irresistibly charming—the best romance film in years. On Prime Video

In the 1920s, when family reputation was worth as much as money, newspaper advertisements could broker alliances and promises of stability. “The Pretender”, with Júlia Mentes and Barnabás Rohonyi, directed by Krisztina Goda, starts from this practice to accompany an agreement that, little by little, becomes an emotional commitment.

The narrative follows a young woman educated at a religious school who returns to home life and finds her destiny defined by a notice in the newspaper, offering a dowry to anyone who agrees to marry her. The suitor is a painter with fragile finances, attracted by the possibility of resolving accounts and starting over. The encounter between interest and need is not treated as a controversy, but rather as a starting point for observing habits, protocols and limits of autonomy. The photography favors warm interiors, the art direction invests in objects that indicate social class and the costume design suggests a gradual transition from obedience to self-confidence, always in moderation.

Krisztina Goda manages short duration and concise scenes without fuss. Instead of programmatic speeches, there are long looks, heavy silences and small movements that give new meaning to each gesture. The humor appears in specific measures, without ridiculing anyone, and the music avoids highlighting emotions beyond what is necessary. The mise-en-scène privileges doors, corridors and dining tables as arenas for negotiation; When someone moves from one room to another, they also change the force field of the conversation. The result is a cadence that allows you to follow the characters’ changes clearly.

Júlia Mentes proposes an attentive protagonist, shy without passivity, capable of measuring words and testing boundaries with delicacy. Barnabás Rohonyi plays a practical man who, faced with the promise of stability, discovers genuine curiosity for his future wife. Chemistry is not based on outbursts; it grows almost imperceptibly, supported by pauses and hesitations that communicate discovery and care. Among the supporting actors, the father represents the business mentality that still ruled many homes, without losing traces of affection. This composition gives credibility to the premise and creates the ground for the gradual shift from financial interest to mutual consideration.

The script assumes that arranged marriage does not disappear with an epiphany. Instead of a sudden rupture, there is slow learning about who the other is, what desires fit into the contract and what is left out. The dowry acts as a constant reminder that feelings can be quantified when society determines so. The narrative, however, does not legitimize this symbolic currency; prefers to show how, based on it, the characters reevaluate priorities and build respect. Nothing there sounds anachronistic: the protagonist does not abandon conventions overnight, and the suitor does not become a progressive serial hero. The rapprochement is born from coexistence and a domestic ethic that imposes itself in the face of old rules.

The suitor’s craft adds an observational layer. Painting requires seeing, and seeing takes time. As he learns to observe the woman beyond the role of “good catch”, the paintings stop being mere breadwinners and become metaphors for the attention that the relationship demands. The camera follows this refinement of the look with discreet movements and compositions that favor medium shots, where hands, objects and clothes communicate what words cannot say. When the protagonist chooses a more sober dress or lingers in front of a window, the film signals the maturation of a desire that needs to fit into the world in which she lives.

As a television film, the production works with contained resources. There are few exteriors, a reduced number of extras and a focus on the houses, studio and nearby streets. At specific moments, the visual economy compresses the idea of ​​a historical period and the dialogues take on an informative function. Still, brevity does not impoverish the proposal. By focusing on recognizable spaces and the intimate work of actors, the project preserves coherence with the chosen narrative outline, without seeking unnecessary grandiloquence.

The assembly follows the logic of smooth ellipses. Changes in trail and cuts between interiors indicate the passage of time and the maturation of bonds. There is no rush to justify decisions, nor redundant exposure of conflicts. When obstacles arise, they obey the practical reason of those years: money, reputation, family conveniences. This choice provides verisimilitude and anchors the drama in social data. At the same time, the direction reserves moments of respite in which the viewer notices small advances, such as the replacement of treatment formulas or the sharing of daily tasks.

The climax is discreet and avoids loud solutions. Instead of spectacular gestures, the conclusion confirms the transformation promoted by the interaction, with plausible consequences for everyone involved. Nothing there depends on forced coincidences. The coherence of the emotional arc is based on the accumulation of details planted early on and the position of each character within the family and the city. This coherence also prevents the film from becoming moralistic: the narrative recognizes the limits of its time and, within them, identifies gaps through which individual choice can breathe.

In addition to the novel, it remains a commentary on how the modernity of the 1920s coexisted with previous habits. Newspaper advertisements, dowries, ateliers, religious schools, domestic salons, and dress patterns make up a social inventory that explains attitudes without reducing anyone to type. The greatest interest lies in the possibility of reconciling affection and responsibility in an environment that values ​​calculation. In the end, the impression remains that everyday delicacy can sustain more lasting bonds than loud swearing. This conclusion, supported by precise interpretations and discreet formal choices, offers the public a period portrait interested in people and the way they learn to see themselves.